DREIESKIVA​|Roald Kvam

Thomas Hobbes’ Of Man, a section from his seminal work Leviathan, explores the nature of human beings, their motivations, and the fundamental principles that govern their behavior. Hobbes provides a mechanistic and materialistic interpretation of human nature, arguing that human actions are driven by self-interest, fear, and the desire for self-preservation. His analysis serves as the foundation for his later political theories, particularly the necessity of a strong, centralized authority to maintain order and prevent chaos.

Let’s explpore Hobbes’ key arguments in Of Man, analyzing his perspectives on human nature, sense perception, language, reason, emotions, and power…

1. The mechanistic nature of human beings

Hobbes begins by asserting that human beings, like all natural phenomena, operate according to mechanical principles. He rejects the notion of an immaterial soul and argues that all aspects of human existence, including thought and emotion, are the result of physical processes in the body. He views human beings as complex machines, functioning through motion and external stimuli. This perspective leads him to examine human behavior scientifically, reducing it to material causes and effects.

Hobbes argues that external objects influence human beings by causing motion in the senses, which is then transmitted to the brain. This sensory input forms the basis of human experience and knowledge. Consequently, human perception is subjective, varying from person to person based on their individual physical and psychological conditions.

2. Sense perception and the basis of knowledge

Hobbes places great emphasis on sense perception as the primary source of knowledge. According to him, all human cognition begins with sensory input. Objects in the external world interact with the senses, producing motions that travel to the brain and result in sensations such as sight, sound, taste, and touch. He argues that there is no innate knowledge in human beings; instead, all understanding arises from sensory experiences and the interpretations formed through them.

This empirical view of knowledge challenges traditional philosophical ideas that posit the existence of innate ideas or divine inspiration. Hobbes maintains that human knowledge is limited and dependent on experience, making certainty elusive. Since all human understanding is derived from sensory experiences, errors and misunderstandings arise when people misinterpret these perceptions.

3. The role of language in human understanding

Language plays a crucial role in Hobbes’ account of human thought and communication. He argues that words are merely arbitrary symbols assigned to objects and concepts, allowing people to categorize their experiences and convey them to others. However, he warns that language can also be a source of confusion and misunderstanding. Since words are conventional rather than natural, people often use them imprecisely, leading to disputes and errors in reasoning.

Hobbes highlights the importance of defining terms carefully, especially in philosophy and politics, to avoid ambiguity and misinterpretation. In his view, logical reasoning and precise definitions are essential tools for developing clear and coherent ideas, ensuring effective communication, and maintaining social order.

4. Reason as a tool for human survival

For Hobbes, reason is not an abstract faculty but a practical tool for navigating the world and ensuring survival. He defines reason as the ability to manipulate signs (words and numbers) to draw conclusions and solve problems. Unlike the rationalist philosophers who viewed reason as an innate faculty, Hobbes sees it as a learned skill, dependent on experience and education.

He argues that reason enables human beings to anticipate future consequences based on past experiences, making them capable of planning and strategizing. This capacity for calculation is what distinguishes humans from animals, who act primarily on instinct. However, reason is fallible, and individuals often miscalculate or act irrationally due to passions, biases, or misinformation.

5. The passions and their influence on human behavior

Hobbes provides a detailed analysis of the passions, or emotions, which he considers the primary drivers of human action. He categorizes passions into two broad groups: those that lead individuals toward objects they desire (appetites) and those that cause them to avoid harmful or unpleasant experiences (aversions). Love, joy, and hope belong to the first category, while fear, anger, and despair belong to the second.

According to Hobbes, the most fundamental passion is the desire for self-preservation. This instinct shapes human behavior, motivating individuals to seek power, security, and comfort. Fear of death and pain is the most powerful aversion, influencing people to avoid danger and seek protection through social structures and agreements.

Hobbes also highlights how the passions influence moral and political behavior. He argues that moral judgments arise not from divine commandments or innate moral sense but from human desires and fears. What is considered «good» is simply what an individual desires, while «evil» is what they seek to avoid. This relativistic view of morality underpins Hobbes’ argument that social order must be established through an external authority rather than relying on subjective moral intuitions.

6. The drive for power and its consequences

A key theme in Of Man is the human drive for power. Hobbes asserts that people naturally seek to enhance their position in the world, striving for greater control over resources, security, and influence. This drive for power is not necessarily malicious but is an inherent aspect of human nature. Individuals compete for wealth, status, and authority, leading to inevitable conflicts.

He distinguishes between two types of power: natural power (derived from physical strength, intelligence, or charisma) and instrumental power (acquired through wealth, alliances, or political influence). Regardless of the form it takes, the pursuit of power is unending; once an individual gains power, they seek more to ensure their continued dominance and security.

This relentless struggle for power creates a state of competition and mistrust, making conflict an inherent part of human existence. Without a strong authority to regulate human interactions, society would descend into chaos, as individuals seek to dominate or protect themselves from others.

7. The implications for political philosophy

Hobbes’ analysis of human nature in Of Man lays the groundwork for his later political arguments in Leviathan. Given that people are driven by self-interest, fear, and the desire for power, he concludes that a strong, centralized authority is necessary to prevent disorder and violence. In the absence of such an authority, individuals exist in a «state of nature,» characterized by constant conflict and insecurity.

To escape this condition, people must enter into a social contract, surrendering some of their freedoms to a sovereign power in exchange for protection and stability. This sovereign authority, whether a monarch or an assembly, must possess absolute power to enforce laws and maintain order. Without such a governing force, society would collapse into anarchy.

---

Thomas Hobbes’ Of Man presents a compelling and systematic exploration of human nature. Through his mechanistic interpretation, he argues that human beings are driven by sensory perception, reason, passions, and the pursuit of power. His analysis of human behavior reveals the fundamental challenges of social cooperation and the necessity of a governing authority to prevent chaos.

Hobbes’ ideas remain highly influential in political philosophy, shaping debates on human nature, morality, and governance. His view of human beings as self-interested and power-seeking creatures provides a stark but realistic foundation for understanding society and the role of political institutions. Ultimately, Of Man serves as a crucial introduction to Hobbes’ broader political thought, illustrating why he advocates for a strong sovereign power to ensure peace and order.